Thursday, July 31, 2008

Anwar akan bertanding di Permatang Pauh

KUALA LUMPUR 31 Julai - Penasihat Parti Keadilan Rakyat Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim hari ini mengumumkan beliau akan bertanding di kawasan Parlimen Permatang Pauh yang dikosongkan oleh isterinya, Datuk Seri Dr. Wan Azizah Wan Ismail berkuat kuasa hari ini.

Pengumuman dibuat pada sidang akhbar di ibu pejabat parti itu di sini sebentar tadi.

Dr. Wan Azizah merupakan Ahli Parlimen kerusi itu sejak pilihan raya umum 1999 iaitu selepas selepas Anwar dipecat daripada parti dan kerajaan setahun sebelum itu dan dihadapkan di mahkamah.

Kini Dr. Wan Azizah merupakan Ketua Pembangkang di Parlimen.- The Star.

dipetik dari Utusan

Petrodollar spending spree in Middle East



OPEC revenue from oil sales reached USD650B in 2006, an increase of 600% compared to its revenue in 1998, although being offset by a nudge with the weakening of the US dollar. If the weakening continues, OPEC may consider switching to Euro. Iran and Qatar is expected to represent almost 50% of total capital expenditure for oil field facilities and structures in the region. Qatar's North field expansion, which was discovered in 1971, has a total of 30 development phases and is estimated to be the size of the whole Qatari peninsula.

Difficulties emerged when the French government had instructed Total to reduce its spending in Iran after the US sanction was in place in Nov 1979.

Kazahkstan is expected to be the second highest spender next to Iran with 20% of regional spending and estimated reserve of 14 Billion barrels of recoverable oil.

Saudi is expected to spend a cool USD 10B for Manila field with a projected 900,000 barrel-per-day production by 2011. The Gulf Karan is expected to produce 1 bcf/d (billion cubic feet per day) by 2011 also.

Exciting times ahead......but will this keep up with increasing demand?

Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Of Foreign Maids, DOE study, UMNO election and ACA

  • The plan by the Terengganu state government to train single mothers as maids is commendable. The State Government needs to think about nationwide deployment of these single mothers and whether an average of RM400-500 per month is sufficient as salary. If these two are not acceptable, then the reliance on foreign maids would likely to increase further.
  • In today's STAR, Deputy Minister of Natural Resources and Enviroment Datuk Maznah Mazlan said that at least 7 out of 184 rivers in the country were classified as highly polluted. Is this really a big surprise to anyone? Isn't it time to report something like "The Ministry is happy to announce that it has completed clean up operations of 15 of the most polluted rivers in the country. The ecotourism in those areas have been restored and are now generating almost RM1M a year thanks to local retail entrepreneurs and tour guides". Singapore has generated massive income form Boat Qui and other strategic river bank locations from ecotourism, retail and F&B. Perhaps Kuching's river side should also be a model or Charles river in Boston, MA.
  • There's a strong contention for the post of Kota Tinggi UMNO Division Chief (incumbent is Datuk Seri Syed Hamid). Syed Hamid trails by 7 nominations behind his challenger Daeng Malek.
  • Since ACA is now investigating Monsoon Cup and the crystal mosque in Terengganu, should it also investigate the sale of MV Augusta for Euro 1 (subsequently sold to both BMW and Harley Davidson for a combined Euro 160M). I wonder if ACA has enough funds and staffing to handle these big cases given the pressure from public to expedite these investigations.

Monday, July 28, 2008

Responding to Dato' Seri Khir Toyo's entry

There was a pretty good article about what the leaders in the past said about power sharing concept and distribution of wealth (taken from Dato' Seri Dr Khir Toyo's blog):

DSKT: "Misalnya apabila Kerajaan Selangor semasa pentadbiran saya menubuhkan Pusat Kebudayaan Melayu dengan peruntukan RM 20 juta, kaum Cina dan India turut mendapat peruntukan yang sama.

Malah kerajaan Selangor di bawah pentadbiran saya merupakan yang pertama melancarkan tabung khas untuk pendidikan anak-anak kaum India yang miskin di bawah Tabung Pendidikan Anak-anak Pekerja Ladang. Kerajaan Selangor juga menaja lebih 100 orang anak kaum India yang miskin untuk belajar kemahiran di Inspens".

Presiden MCA, Tun Tan Siew Sin, dilaporkan dalam akhbar tempatan bertajuk "Tun Tan Answers Critics on special Previleges" dalam pada 30 april 1969, berkata:

"The Malays, through UMNO, were generous enough to relax the citizenship laws of this country to such extent that within 12 months of independence, 90 percent were still non-citizens after nearly 100 years of colonial rule in the Malay States. In return for this major concession. the MCA and the MIC agreed to continue the policy of preserving the special position of the Malays while at the same time upholding the legitimate interest of other communities."

- Sumber Tan Sri Khalid Awang Osman, Malaysia - An Anthology, Vantage Press, New York, hal. 38-39.

UCAPAN PRESIDEN MIC merangkap MENTERI KERJAYA RAYA, POS DAN TELEKOM, TUN V.T. SAMBANTHAN DI DEWAN RAKYAT PADA 1 JUN 1965.

"Now, in 1955 we won the elections with a great majority. Then we obtained freedom in two years time. During this period, we had to discuss citizenship and various other things. Now what did the Malays do - since we are speaking on racial lines - what did the Malay leadership do? The had 88 percent of the electorate still with them. What did they do with citizenship?

If we look around in Asia and East Asia, particularly, you will find that my race the indian race, is not welcomed in Ceylon, is not welcomed in Burma. Look at my brother Chinnese race, it is not welcomed in Thailand, in Vietnam, in Cambodia, in all the other areas. What help do they get for citizenship in all these territories? In Burma, as we know, Indian have been send packing, in Ceylon they refused them citizenship and in Burma it is likewise. I know it, you know it. And yet in Malaya what happened? Here we found that the Malay leadership said, "We shall tkae them unto ourselves as brothers, we shall give them full opportunity to live in this country, we shall give them every opportunity to become citizens." And so, in 1957, for the whole year, we waived language qualifications, and tens of thousand of Indians, Chinnese, Ceylonese and others became citizens...

As I said, it has been my great good fortune to have born in this country. Where else can you find a more charitable, a more polite, a more decent race than Malay race? Where else can you get such politically decent treatment for any immigrant race? Where else in the history of the world? I ask you. These are the facts. Who are you to safeguards us? I am 10 percent minority race here. But I am happy here.

My response: I despise the Malays questioning their own rights in the Constitution. Having said that as well, I do know that numerous Malays are furious not because of their Constitutional rights, but how some leaders are treating them and getting away with blatant abuse of power. That is why we have a democratic process whereby the majority decides who they want as their leader.

As for the other races, the chinese and the indians, the question about the constitutional rights is a non-issue. It is not that easy to amend the constitution especially when the Malays are the majority. Having said that, there are moderate chinese and indians who do not question the rights and want to live in peace and harmony with the Malays as long as their rights are not taken away from them, likewise there are moderate Malays who share the same philosophies. Even Tun Mahathir said that it's better to share a pie that's growing rather than not have a pie at all.

Coalition cracking again? (Update 1)

28/7: Gelugor MP Karpal Singh condemns PAS for discussing issues with UMNO in the name of Malay unity. He said that Pakatan Rakyat should re-evaluate its partners involvement in the coalition (senior partner mind you with 2 states under their belt).

After the resignation of Sr SO to Menteri Besar Selangor, now there's dispute on money transferred to PKR accounts, Penang's resentment on Kedah's intention to pursue logging activities, DAP's disapproval of PAS' islamic state concept. Don't people discuss things before making press statements or is it just plain acting for PR (public relations, not Pakatan Rakyat)?....Is the coalition disintegrating again?

On the same note, Ezam left and joined UMNO. Dato' Nalla left and formed his own party. What would be the driving force for these decisions? Obviously both are gatekeepers of key tactical and strategic information. Is this a trojan horse play? Is this all planned? Who knows.

What I do know is that it will be another exciting term in UMNO and Malaysian politics come December. Reporters and political analysts alike are making predictions and betting on their 'horses', anticipating the big guns' maneuvering judging from recent events and press statements. People have started lobbying for positions in the party, which is norm in election year. This is when you get phone calls from people you haven't heard from since the last party election. I hope UMNO in all levels will make the right choices and not revert to the old ways of thinking (always difficult to choose between making the right decision and making the popular decision) or simply put "SOS" (same old shit). If not, it will be another tough battle come 13th GE.

Coffee shops all over the country are talking about who's contesting what post. We must not forget that the party rebuilding process has precedence and is a monumental initiative. As such, please put your votes to good use.

Recent events in coalition parties suggest that change is inevitable. Like Barack Obama's campaign; let's have a 'change we can believe in'.

Then again, I suspect it will be SOS. What do you think? Or do you think it's no longer relevant?

Sunday, July 27, 2008

UMNO Election (Update 4) and PR's choice for DPM (update 1)

Update 4 (28/7): Tok Pa pulled out from the race.

Update 3 (27/7): Datuk Seri Utama Mohamad Hassan pulled out from the VP race.

Update 2 (25/7): List of UMNO Vice Presidency candidates:
  1. DS Hishamuddin Tun Hussein
  2. DS Syed Hamid Albar (being challenged at Division)
  3. TS Rahim Tamby Chik
  4. DS Khaled Nordin
  5. DS Ali Rustam
  6. TS Muhammad Muhammad Taib
  7. DS Shafie Afdal
  8. DS Adnan Yaakob
  9. DS Musa Aman
  10. TS Mohd Isa Abdul Samad
  11. DS Rais Yatim (being challenged at Division by his deputy Datuk Yunus Rahmat, Klawang State Assemblyman)
  12. DS Shahidan Kassim
  13. Datuk Zahid Hamidi
20/7:
  • One branch attempted to open the flood gates by nominating Datuk Seri Najib as UMNO president. One division in Johor might follow suit. Other contests:
  • Sembrong, Kubang Pasu (TDM's former division), Balakaban (enjoying pension money after declining deputy minister post), Beaufort, Sipitang have nominated AAB as President and DSNR as Deputy President.
  • Gua Musang nominated their chief as candidate for presidency
  • Putrajaya plans to also nominate AAB and DSNR this Saturday
  • D Mukhriz supports DS Hisham's notion that the top two posts should be contested
  • PR has officially announced DSAI as their choice for the top seat should PR takes over from BN government. The question is, who is their choice for DPM? PAS will be furious if the composition of the newly formed government does not have at least 60% of Malay YBs after the planned hop in September (now DSAI says the plan has been delayed because of the sodomy case). PAS has already met with their UMNO counterparts to discuss issues regards the Malays and Islam. Will this widen the crack in Pakatan Rakyat?

Friday, July 25, 2008

Terengganu MB prefers Mercedes (update 8)

Update 8 (27/7): Excos were seen using the mercs less the visitors, despite instructions from numero uno. So far, 9 have been questioned by ACA regarding the high maintenance costs incurred for the Perdana V6 fleet.

Update 7 (26/7): Now Datuk Ahmad Said is requesting ACA to investigate the other 'mega projects' instead of picking on the little cases. Meanwhile, Datuk Syed Zainal Abidin made it clear that the cars used by Terengganu State Executives cost RM542 per year on average for maintenance. Meanwhile, correction for update 6: PM approved the procurement of the cars but not to be used by Excos, only for state visitors. Datuk Seri Idris Jusoh is also considering to file a lawsuit against the Terengganu State Government for producing erroneous figures. State Secretary Datuk Mokhtar Nong apologized for the inaccurate figure, claiming it was a regrettable by a clerk. Dato' Seri Najib is urging Terengganu to consider this case closed.

Update 6 (25/7): PM approved the use of Mercedes for Terengganu MB and State Excos, according to Terengganu MB himself during a press conference today after lunch.

Update 5 (25/7): The Terengganu Exco spent RM1M for the last 4 years to maintain their fleet of Perdana V6 cars (clever attempt to divert attention to the former MB). Meanwhile, the current Exco line up is adamant to use the newly procured Benzs.

Update 4 (24/7): BPR has been mobilized to investigate the procurement of the Merdeces cars and whether proper procedure was followed. Datuk Ahmad Said defended himself by releasing the maintenance expense of the car used by former MB, Dato' Idris Jusoh. The costs of maintenance were allegedly increased by 25% higher than actual for some reason.

Update 3 (24/7): For someone who defied the Prime Minister of Malaysia during the selection of Menteri Besar, I don't think Datuk Ahmad Said really cares what people think about the procurement of the cars. Despite showing the "Surat Pekeliling Perbendaharaan Bil. 1 Tahun 2008", Datuk Shahrir Samad said that all administrators including Menteri Besar are supposed to use the national car. The need for other CKD cars apply for 4-wheel drives for special purposes or other types of vehicles for specific use.

Update 2 (23/7): Cost to maintain Perdana V6 is RM175k.

Update 1 (21/7) : DS Najib to discuss the purchase by Terengganu MB in the next cabinet meeting. " “Saya guna kereta nasional dan Perdana Menteri pun gunakan kereta nasional,” katanya.

After bulldozing his way to MB's office, defying the Prime Minister with the backing of the King himself and demanding the return of royalty money for Terengganu from oil exploration.... his first act as Menteri Besar.....is to purchase Mercedes for fellow exco members. His justification is that Proton cars don't last for more than 2 years. Should he suggest that PM, DPM and cabinet ministers trade-in their V6's to E200s? Syabas Terengganu folks for choosing your distinguished leader! Please let us know when leaders are ready to get some work done.

Thursday, July 24, 2008

Anwar contesting this time?

After declining to take Permatang Pauh, Lembah Pantai or Bandar Tun Razak, Anwar was window-shopping and hoping that Kuala Kangsar would be vacant due to alleged irregularities during election by BN. After the court over ruled this, now it's Kulim Bandar Baharu. BN candidate claims that YB Zulkifli Nordin (former Royal Military College cadet) did not file his expense claims for during his campaign in 2004. If a by-election is required, would Zulkifli Noordin make way for DSAI?

DSAI also claims that 1 former UMNO MP and 1 division chief have joined PKR. Although he has changed his tune subtlety, we're not sure whether the plan for 16th September is a go. Before he goes down with another court case, why can't he just get the MPs to cross over and form the government now? What's he waiting for? (He did mention that the sodomy case would inevitably delay the process).

Pesanan Tun Dr Mahathir 1

…“Pada 11hb November pula, saya telah diterima bertemu Yang Teramat Mulia Tunku, yang saya hormati sebagai bekas Presiden UMNO, sebagai bekas Perdana Menteri Malaysia yang pertama, sebagai Bapa Kemerdekaan dan Bapa Malaysia. Sudah tentu saya menghormati Tunku sebagai orang yang lebih tua daripada saya, kerana ini adalah adat Melayu, lebih-lebih lagi Tunku adalah daripada keluarga Di-Raja negeri saya.”

“Saya berpeluang mendengar pandangan Tunku berkenaan dengan perpaduan orang Melayu dan berkenaan kedudukan dan hak-hak kaum di Malaysia. Saya juga berpeluang menjelaskan sedikit sebanyak berkenaan dengan kedudukan UMNO sekarang dan bagaimana Parlimen tidak berkuasa membatalkan hukuman yang telah dibuat oleh mahkamah.”

YAB Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad
17hb. November 1989

Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Don’t we have better things to worry about? (Update 1)

22 July: Penang state assemblymen refusing to wear baju istiadat.

9 June: Bravo fellow state assemblymen for being concern about wearing songkok!

Next thing you know, they will start questioning why non-Malay soldiers need to raise their hands for the reading of doa’ during parades? And what’s wrong with having prefects wear songkok in school? It’s not like they’re imposing a rule to have non-Malays wear Baju Melayu on Fridays or imposing non-Malays to embrace Islam, grow up! Don’t we have far more important things to worry about?

*STAR article*

*What Lim Kit Siang has to say*

*Melayu Angkat*

Politics in Facebook

When i first opened a facebook account, the first impression I had was that it was just another social network site. It's fun when you get to poke someone in cyber world, send virtual flowers to your wife, 'buy' someone as a 'pet' and get some virtual furniture for someone's virtual room. Nowadays, people take fb so seriously that it's even used for campaigning. Senator Obama has by far the largest fan base of more than 1.1M, the second closest is a group called "Apple students (those who appreciate Apple products) at close to 1/2 million members. Hilary and McCain both have 170,000 a piece. Michelle Obama seems to be more popular at 60,000 fans vs George Bush at 18,000 fans (perhaps conservatives don't surf that much). TDM has about 6,000, DSAI has 4,300, Mukhriz has 2,800 and Abdullah Ahmad Badawi has 400. Numerous politicians also have accounts such as DS Khaled Nordin, TS Khalid Ibrahim, Datuk Mukhriz, KJ, DS Nizar, Tony Pua, Lim Kit Siang, etc.

The age of fb will see people declaring their interests and political affiliation openly whether they're pro or anti govt, whether they want who to step down or who to become PM. Of course, they are also impostors, i.e. if you search for some controversial figures, you'll find a few 'versions'. Some of the political groups you could find on fb:
Saiful Bukhari Azlan has a fan base of over 100 and 200 think he's a big liar. If 65,000 members are not happy with the petrol price but only 600 members want DSAI to be the next PM, does that mean people are mostly concerned about their daily lives, not so much about who runs the country?

What I find revolutionizing is that people are now becoming more expressive in the way they show their emotions and there is no longer secrecy as to whom you support or what/who you don't like. You could judge how people generally feel about issues. Of course, this only represents the internet users only but it gives you a good feel. Someone's status could read "x is unhappy with the government" or "x thinks DSAI is framed again". This is indeed a good tool to do surveys on. Good or bad in declaring how you feel, that's up to each individual.

The blog fever has flooded facebook (btw Chedet.com has more than 4m hits since May 08 and Dr Khir's blog has 770k hits since Mar 08). People want to be heard.

Sunday, July 20, 2008

Inul's concert cancelled


What's wrong with this picture? With one day before the concert, a few agencies agreed to cancel the concert after granting permission (another flip flop). This shows such immaturity. What should be the basis of the cancellation? Perhaps it's the controversial way of Inul's dance move.

1. Why approve it in the first place?
2. If we are against the 'obscene' and 'controversial' dancing style, why don't we ban MTV and Channel V (as if people can't youtube)? As if the dancers at our local clubs are not controversial.
3. Isn't that a big loss of revenue for the city (from taxes), hawkers, restaurant operators with an estimated of 8,000 ?
4. If we're willing to go that extra mile, how about the sales of alcohol to minors & Muslims at the pubs in JB and other vice activities in the city? If we want to clean our act up, we can't be partial and hypocritical.

US$52M in June

The Meaning of Obama's $52-Million Month

While our leaders have to fork out money for plane tickets, hotel, petrol, cigarette; the developed nations chip in to support their presidential candidates with both sides having a war chest of almost US$180M combined. That's some serious money from lobbyists, special interest groups, concerned citizens, girl scouts, etc. If the Old Putera Association starts collecting US$30k per table, we could have our own President run for any party presidency. Something to ponder.

"Two numbers tell the entire Obama story: $2 million and $68. The latter is the average size of a contribution to the Obama campaign in June. The amazing thing is that it's about $30 lower than the average contribution in May, April or March. This indicates that the senator attracted a massive number of new $5, $10, $20 donors once the primaries ended--presumably from the ranks of devoted Dems who had (until then) supported Hillary Clinton" (think about the last time your supporter chipped in RM68 for you).

"
Ultimately, Obama could raise more than $250 million by Election Day if he continues at this pace--and judging by his expanding pool of small donors, he will".

Saturday, July 19, 2008

Konvensyen Ekonomi Melayu



Saya baru sahaja menghadiri konvensyen yg telah dianjurkan oleh Gagasan Badan Ekonomi Melayu (GABEM). Telah banyak konvensyen2 dan forum2 seperti ini diadakan untuk membincang dan mengkaji dasar2 kerajaan untuk memastikan orang2 Melayu tidak ketinggalan dalam arus ekonomi global. Naib Chansellor2 universiti tempatan hadir untuk membincang persaingan dengan universiti2 antarabangsa, kualiti institusi pengajian tinggi di negara ini dan pembangunan modal insan. Ketua2 Eksekutif syarikat2 GLC turut serta membincang status penguasaan ekonomi melayu. Yg pasti, terlampau banyak dasar2 kerajaan yg membantu usahawan2 melayu bersaing dengan bangsa2 lain. Terpulang kepada orang Melayu untuk berusaha dan mencari peluang perniagaan, bukan menunggu kerajaan membuat saranan.

Ketua Eksekutif MATRADE berpendapat bahawa orang2 Melayu perlu ada keyakinan untuk berkecimpung dalam arena perniagaan. Orang Melayu perlu sedar bahawa persaingan bukan sahaja di antara orang2 Melayu, bahkan dengan bangsa2 lain di dalam dan di luar negara. Rangkaian perniagaan perlu diperluaskan dan jgn hanya mengharapkan kerajaan untuk membantu. Usahawan perlu ada inisiatif sendiri untuk berjaya. Ramai usahawan2 Melayu telah berjaya memasarkan produk2 ke luar negara dan sekarang bertaraf global.

Timbalan Presiden Kanan SME bank membuat komen tentang sikap2 usahawan2 Melayu yg leka dalam perniagaan dan tidak memberi perhatian kepada angka (dalam konteks kemas kini akaun) dan perancangan jangka masa panjang.

Komen dari peserta:

1. Pihak bank di Malaysia masih bersikap 'risk-aversed'. Bank2 pembangunan seperti SME dll ditubuhkan utk melonjak perniagaan usahawan2 tempatan. Keuntungan adalah keutamaan yg kedua.

YB Menteri Pertanian pula berpendapat orang2 Melayu di luar bandar masih memerlukan bantuan kerajaan dalam sektor pertanian (saya menyokong pandangan beliau). Jgnlah orang2 Melayu di bandar lupakan bangsa mereka di kampung semata2 kerana mereka telah berjaya. Dasar2 kerajaan seperti DEB masih diperlukan untuk membantu orang2 Melayu yg masih susah. DEB membantu org2 miskin tanpa mengira warna kulit. Yg menjadi persoalan ialah berapa lamakah orang2 Melayu memerlukan bantuan kerajaaan.

Komen dari peserta:

1. Tiada 'follow through' oleh kerajaan. Rata2 dasar yg dibuat semua eloknya. Yg perlu ditekankan ialah 'follow through' (ini komen yg agak biasa didengari). Contoh ialah konsep glokal di mana kita berakarkan nasionalisma tetapi berakal antarabangsa.

2. Datuk Wahab Sidek, Ketua Eksekutif MSWG berkata kerajaan perlu menunjukkan komitmen yg lebih untuk memastikan konvensyen2 ini tidak menjadi gelanggang untuk retorik sahaja. Beliau menyentuh kegagalan KUB dalam menjaga nasib pemegang2 saham koperasi dan tiada 'accountability' apabila sesuatu dasar itu gagal. Beliau juga berpendapat bahawa data2 yg dikumpul dari tinjauan mungkin perlu dipersoalkan. Contoh: walaupun terdapat lebih kurang 30% akauntan yg terdiri dari orang Melayu, tetapi bukan semuanya diiktiraf oleh MIA (Malaysia Institute of Accountants).

3. Konsep FELDA oleh Tun Razak ternyata suatu yg inovatif dan perlu digunapakai untuk penanaman lain seperti padi dan sebagainya. Kawasan2 baru diberi kepada peneroka untuk diusahakan.

Pendapat saya: Orang2 Melayu masih berkecimpung dalam perniagaan2 'red ocean' dimana persaingannya sudah tepu dan sengit. Perniagaan2 orang2 Melayu juga 'labor-intensive' dan bukan berdasarkan 'k-economy' atau ekonomi berasaskan pengetahuan. Mentaliti ini perlu diterap pada tahap yg lebih awal lagi di sekolah2 dan universiti2. Org2 Melayu juga perlu mengkaji persahabatan perniagaan yg strategik dgn bangsa2 lain yg dapat membawa kepakaran unik. YB DS JJ pernah menggesa anak2 muda supaya memasuki arena 'k-economy' dan 'blue ocean businesses' jika berminat dalam dunia perniagaan.

Walaupun keadaan orang2 Melayu rata2 masih ketinggalan, kita perlu memberi penghormatan kepada usahawan2 Melayu yg telah berjaya dalam bidang perniagaan bukan sahaja yg memiliki syarikat2 gergasi tetapi rakan2 muda kita dan berdoa supaya mereka lebih maju di masa hadapan. Perasaan dengki orang Melayu perlu dibuang.

Friday, July 18, 2008

mylivingwall.com



I had a pleasant comment today appreciating one particular article I wrote about PAS co-operating with UMNO. To my surprise, it was featured in the website at http://mylivingwall.com. Thanks for your support!

Efficiency in Allocating Resources (of scholarships and NEP provisions)

Parliament is actively debating the allocation of scholarships with respect to racial composition in the country. The scholarships would allow students to further their studies to possibly the university of their choice or with similar credentials. The current allocation is 55% for Bumiputra and 45% for nons. According to YB Ahmad Maslan (BN-Pontian), the latest statistical data indicates the population of Bumiputra at 66%, therefore the allocation of scholarship should reflect the racial composition.

This is a highly sensitive subject, therefore requires much discussion and debate (contrary to what people in general think that the more sensitive it is, the less we should talk about it). Having said that, I'm walking on thin ice and trying to use the best of terms and words to describe and relay my opinion on this subject matter. The NEP/NDP has always been well-intended (to eliminate identification of race by economic function). It is also a well-thought plan to elevate the Malays to high economic stature. However, the by-product of NED/NDP could be the further polarization in this country because of the poor implementation and leakages.
  • The common argument is that the Malays in the rural area are not ready to compete, therefore require aid to compete in the 'open' market context. I totally agree with this (but it shouldn't sacrifice the need to attract the brightest and smartest).
  • UMNO leaders will continue to fight for the allocation for the Malays as they are their power base, likewise the other parties.
  • As long as we have fragmented education system starting from primary level, the segregation and polarization would continue to get worse and it would be more apparent at tertiary level.
  • Universities need to be ran by professionals without 'political obligations'. Universities should also be ran like a business. Harvard attracts an endowment fund of close to US27B because it's being run like a business. I'm not saying we can be like Harvard in 5 years, I'm just saying we have to head in that direction. Down South has a better rated university than us because it's ran like a business. It is a business. It's one of the biggest revenue for the US after arms, entertainment and technology.
  • On scholarships: Contractual agreements must be reviewed to ensure that our students return home and serve the country, be it private or public sector. A small percentage of scholars (including non-Bumi) must be groomed to enter the public sector, be it GLC or into the government as PTD officers. Have them sign a contract for at least 7 years.
  • Students who fail to maintain scholastic achievements must repay the full amount of the scholarship and sent back home. The effort in collecting debt from unpaid student loans must be doubled. Those who violate this must be sued and be made example.
  • A small percentage must be allocated for the 'elite' students, those who have a high chance of gaining entry into Ivy League or Ivy-League equivalent schools, the Oxfords of the world, Imperial etc. THESE are the ones we need to take care of. This should be merit-based regardless of family background. These students should be lined up for the next CEOs and senior managements of GLC, govt, banking institutions, multinationals, universities (need to encourage the teaching profession by increasing pay grade for those who deserve), etc.
  • What I'm interested to know is how much the scholarship covers and what is the actual budget. I don't think everyone needs to get really excited about this since other corporate entities offer scholarships as well. If the other non-Malays think Petronas and such are too biased and award scholarships to only Malays, let's get the big Chinese conglomerates to fly Malay students to MIT, then we'll talk.
  • Judging from my personal recruitment experience of local graduates, our local products are still mediocre. Little confidence level, poor command of English. It is consistent with feedback from other oil companies. There needs to be a balance between adhering to the quota and getting the best and brightest.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

On Debates and Parliamentary 'Acts'

Debates are expected to be the next in-thing. Healthy debates are good to thrash out ideas and point of view. Debates also show character and how people would react to pressure. The candidates for UMNO presidency, deputy presidency and vice presidency should be invited to debate on topics related to the relevance of the party's struggle (but if the post of president and deputy were recommended to be closed for contest, who are they going to debate against?).

The only recommendation I could think of for future debates is to have a stern moderator who controls the topic of discussion. Debaters MUST answer the questions given by the panel appointed. Of course, veteran politicians tend to beat around the bush when it comes to answering questions. However, we're more interested to discuss numbers and facts. Save the political talk during party programs. So far, it's a good start for Malaysian political landscape. It also boosts tv ratings and advertising potentials.

On MPs and their parliamentary class act (giving the speaker a big headache) and other stunts:
  • MP cycling to Parliament. Have they been cycling to work lately?
  • MPs from Perak including MB took the bus to Parliament.
  • MP proposed to build rocket launch pad in Sabah
  • The use of the word "Bocor" (9th May 2007, 2 MPs used the word "bocor" against Batu Gajah MP and forced to apologize by DS Sharizat)
  • Raising the right hand during swearing-in ceremony (8th May 2008, when one MP did not raise his right hand during swearing-in ceremony, another MP claimed that his right hand is injured and did not want to raise his)
  • 1oth July 08: MPs got riled about goats and how one Australian stud could mate with 80 females goats.
  • MPs talking about "pokok tidak akan bergoyang kalau tiada angin bertiup (the tree would not sway if there is no wind blowing)" followed by "mungkin ada monyet yang menggoyangkan pokok (maybe there's a monkey shaking it)".
  • Close-one-eye MP (last session)

Wednesday, July 16, 2008

4th Best Airport in the world: KLIA & Drilling in the OCS

While we worry about who sodomized who, who should get subsidies, massive traffic jam in the city and the lack of professionalism in the Parliament, we failed to recognize the people at Malaysia Airports for a job well done! Can still improve :)

From Forbes:

On KLIA: This airport has won several accolades since opening in 1998. In addition to ranking forth in Skytrax's World Airport Awards, it also ranked first on the company's list of airports with the best immigration service. While passengers are almost guaranteed a seamless arrival and departure experience, they can also enjoy free wi-fi, luxury shopping and reflexology and massage services.

Down south got second place (still beatable):

Since Skytrax began ranking airports in 1999, Singapore Changi has placed first twice. The airport was built in 1981, and it has since added more terminals that cater to both budget and luxury passengers. The up-to-date services and amenities include an indoor orchid garden, a rooftop swimming pool, themed television lounges and a free sight-seeing tour for those who have at least five hours prior to their connecting flight.

Don't forget the recognition needs to go to Tan Sri Hassan Merican and Petronas staff as well for making us proud!

I also consider the fuel subsidy a closed issue. Let's move on to other interesting stuff like a standardized education, fuel efficiency and sustainability and such.

On oil development, Bush will endorse drilling in the Outer Continental Shelf (OCS). The US is surrounded by 4 OCS (Gulf of Mexico, Atlantic, Alaska and Pacific OCSs). The OCS is practically the area between the continent and deep ocean. He reckons there is approximately 18 billion of oil in these areas. Even if he manages to lift the ban on drilling in the OCS, it won't help reduce the current oil price. It will take years to develop these fields, the price of steel has increased to more than US1000 a tonne which slows down construction and increases price of platforms and rigs. It will take at least 1-2 years to explore and another 2-3 years to begin development. By then, oil would be USD200/bbl. Senator Obama plans to increase fuel efficiency by spending more money in car engine research, E85 at the pumps. He is also an advocate of the environment and wants to see the US help reduce green house gas emission as they are the biggest consumer of oil.

Tuesday, July 15, 2008

Fuel debate Anwar vs Shabery

How did everyone rate the minister vs the former deputy prime minister of Malaysia? The debate started off solid with DSAI harping the same tune of promising the rakyat that the PR would decrease fuel price by 50 cents per L if they rule the country. He would also squeeze additional funds from the subsidies the IPPs enjoy from gas usage for power generation, claiming that TNB has an over capacity of power generation. Dato' Shabery started with claiming PR using the populist stand (why did PR change their subsidy amount? before the debate, they claimed that they're able to reduce it back to RM1.92, now it's RM2.20). When money is allocated for subsidies, the market is distorted and we deprive allocation for other essentials. During the oil embargo by the Arabs following the Yum Kippur war, Tun Razak, the then PM, established Petronas (together with Ku Li as Chairman) to participate in the oil business as to reduce the dependence of foreign oil. The comparison of other oil exporting countries and its income per capita and inflation rates were also discussed briefly. DSAI argued that too many bail outs by the Government occurred that had siphoned off the royalty money and dividends paid by Petronas to the Government (wasn't he Finance Minister involved in several bail outs himself?).

At this juncture, both diverted from fuel debate and talked about demonstrations, and other non-issues. Both did not answer the questions, i.e. when asked about the Tabung Warisan, Anwar talked about governance, transparency and the need to curb corruption. Shabery blamed DSAI for being part of the problem when he was TPM and FM. Shabery claimed that the debate is proof that the government today is more open, not in comparison to the government when DSAI was TPM (is Shabery also indirectly blaming TDM? Perhaps people weren't so keen of debates back then, that was before the youtube and facebook generation). Shabery also claimed that the greatness of Petronas is proof of the greatness of UMNO and the BN government (I dont think this would run well with TSH). That's when I changed channel, played with my 4-yr old. No air, no air.

Next debate: the sale of MV Augusta?

The Strength of the Malays, PAS co-operating with UMNO & of Biotech competition in the south

Had an intellectual chat with a senior OP whom I highly respect. When I was 17, he was actually the first person lecturing my peers and I about the history of the Malacca sultanate, the special rights of the Malays and that we should not be ashamed of having that constitutional provision. He also instilled a sense of nationalism in our head and continuously reminded us that we have the responsibility to the nation to serve to lead.

Fast forward to 11 years later, I still see the same spirit in him when talking about the present political landscape. We both agreed that the provision in Article 153 of the Constitution has been opened to abuse by people driven by greed and lust of power. He agreed that race-based politics was by design not intention, that the colonial masters had established the system in such a way that the basis of politics is racial background. I personally think that we would see this trend diminish in the urban areas.

On the sensitivities among the non-Malays about Article 153, he argued that the non-Malays should not feel threatened as long as the policy is administered well. The Malays should be the ones protecting not only their interests but also ensuring that the entitlement for others is not compromised (with power comes great responsibility).

Malays who have been offered scholarships and have completed their studies must fulfill their contractual obligations. Those who were offered loans and defaulted should be punished severely for abusing the privilege. Same goes with leaders who flaunt openly with their wealth and mansions. The decline of moral in leaders and the Malaysian citizens is apparent. The respect of law and order has also diminished extensively. Mat rempits should be taken off the streets and forced to conduct community service or be sent to jail for rehab or labor work (this would reduce the need for foreign workers by 5% in the construction industry).

We also talked about our alma mater and the merits of relocation. He did convince me that relocation made some sense. First of all, the buildings that we have were not meant to last long. The walls of the dormitories are made of asbestos and the whole structure is slowly falling apart. The relocation would enable us to build something more resilient and relevant to current times. This should be a permanent feature and we must ensure that the construction is solid to avoid another relocation in 50 years. It should reflect the greatness of RMC but not too much that it pampers the boys too much. I'm just worried about the close proximity of the power lines. The old buildings should remain in the hands of RMC, not NDU. Allocation should also be put aside for the International Baccalaureate program. MCKK and TKC are the other 2 schools intending to implement the same system within the next few years.

On the poor participation among the young ones to give back, he agreed that youths are typically highly-driven and energetic. They should focus their energies and ideas into actions and also listen to wise old men for advice.

Other news:
  • PAS cannot be taken lightly. With 83 seats compared to DAP's 73 and PKR's 40, it is the actual backbone of PR with 2 states under its belt. Why is it consulting with UMNO? Another crack in the coalition? Even Selangor PAS youths are giving the subtle hints.
  • Meanwhile, is Malaysia Biotech Corp ready to take on Singapore? "One ground-breaking proposal is to let promising biotech firms list even if they do not have a financial track record. The move could make Singapore the first stop for such firms in Asia". That is a very bold and competitive move. How will we counter this and continue to attract investors?
  • On food price increase: Even religious ceremonies were not spared.

Monday, July 14, 2008

MV Augusta

*The Star*

From chedet.com

M.V. Agusta

1. Proton bought this Italian motorcycle maker for 70 million Euro (about RM350 million).

2. Its savvy management sold it for 1 Euro (RM5) to an unknown company in Italy.

3. Some months ago Husqvarna, a division of M.V. Agusta which manufactures scrambler sporty off-road motorcycles was sold to a German company, BMW for 90 million Euro (RM450 million). Now the rest of M.V. Agusta has been bought by Harley-Davidson Motor Cycles of the United States for RM350 million.

4. So Proton lost approximately RM800 million selling M.V. Agusta for RM5. The buyer invested one Euro and made 160 million Euro.

5. Do we need a Royal Commission to look into this or should the ACA investigate this matter particularly the role of Credit Suisse who was paid a huge consultancy fee to advise Proton's management who executed it.

6. Or maybe we do not mind losing RM800 million because we have so much money.

Answer to comments on "Malaysia for Malaysians and Special Rights of the Malays"

my answer:

bats, Article 153 grants the Yang di-Pertuan Agong, or King of Malaysia, responsibility for safeguarding the rights and privileges of the Malay and other indigenous peoples of Malaysia, collectively referred to as Bumiputra. The article specifies how the federal government may protect the interest of these groups by establishing quotas for entry into the civil service, public scholarships and public education. It is often considered to be part of the social contract (Wiki). The word "position" is just another preposition used. Let's skip the terminologies and technicalities of it. We all understand there's a provision for the Malays in the Constitution.

On scholarships and education; in general, the rural folks are far behind compared to those privileged in the cities with better infrastructure, resources and man power. The classic argument is that scholarships should be for low-income families and not for smart rich kids. We forget the middle-class group which is diminishing slowly over time. This is also another group that needs aid. Tertiary education is not cheap as you have experienced yourself. The poverty cycle is something hard to be breached. The kids in the rural area are behind compared to their peers in the cities due to family obligations and others. Question is: do we fund the poor but mediocre or fund the smart ones but could barely afford it (forget about the rich and the definition of rich for now). Is the requirement of a scholarship based on meritocracy or family wealth? It should be a balance of both.

Under privileged group is getting aid and fundings from the government. How do you think they get their books, uniforms, skim susu, transportation allowance, etc. How do you think ppl get to go to universities in Malaysia? Where do you think RM7B per year goes to if not for subsidies in education? There are vast improvements need to be done in our education system. There are leakages of course but a person as smart as you can't possibly believe that all of that is going to someone's pocket?

On acquisition of projects from influential people: this is not just a Malaysian problem, it's everywhere. The collusion of politics and business is unavoidable even in the developed countries. In the US, they are called the "Special Interest" groups ranging from guns for the constitutional provision of the right to bear arms, tobacco, oil, defence. We can get into details offline.

I won't say the execution of NEP was flawed. It has its weaknesses but we've seen an elevation of status. Maybe not as much as we would like, but better. The profession of lawyers and doctors are dominated by the Indians. Where do you think they went to school and who paid for their schooling? The construction of universities and institutions such as MARA have helped increase the number of Malay young professionals. There is still hard core poverty not just in Malaysia, but the whole planet. It doesn't mean we haven't done anything to improve. The most powerful country in the world couldn't even organize emergency teams when Katrina hit New Orleans. In the outskirt of Chicago, a bustling city in the US, lies Madison street where 1 out of 3 African Americans goes to jail for some felony due to poverty.

My stand has always been this: stop blaming others, you have to be responsible for your own well being. For people in privileged positions, participate and help out. This is what's lacking among youths these days who are too busy with their jobs. The next time you spend your weekend watching HBO, think about what you could have done for someone else.

from bats:

what started out as "Special Position.." at the beginning of the article morphed (unintentional, i'm sure) into "Special Rights..." by the end of the piece, and there-in lies the problem.

while the idea is noble, the execution, as i've witnessed, is anything but. 55% of the economic pie is no small feat, but are we ever going to achieve that if the country's wealth is only distributed amongst the ruling elite? it has become a family business and since families never really die, we're going nowhere.

we all know of folks who latch on to politicians in hope of projects, only to sub them out anyway. so what you have is a small circle of bumis and non-bumis who feast on the proverbial pie, while the ones who really need a little love don't get any. 55% or whatever that number is, will remain a pipe dream. what you'll get instead is a group of millionares, even billionares, but that's about it.

it's a touchy subject. blood has been shed over it, sure. but if that's the approach, then status quo will rule for decades to come. we can all accept, sit down and get on with it. SOS.

there is no harm in Islam being the official religion and the King being the head of state. Our country is unique and its identity is its badge of honour. god bless our country for that. I am pretty sure that with good governance, Malaysians will be fine with that, as they have been for yonks now.

what we must acknowledge is the fact that not only underprivelaged malays need this help. underprivelaged others need this handicap too. if that is understood and accepted, we can then put an end to the hijacking and put our country's wealth to good use. you're right, we're seeing it in the cities, but again, those calling for the total abolishment of this policy, the very ones who gained from it, should calm the f*ck down and accept that it will take time to uplift the economic standing of the underprivelaged, be it malays or anyone else.

for a start, the clowns bitching about PSD's decision to increase scholarhips for non-bumis should be flogged. what's their beef with children of other Malaysians who share the same IC colour?

Malaysia for Malaysians & The Special Rights of the Malays

I had an interesting discussion with a government officer today about the relevance of race-based politics and the Special Position of the Malays in the Constitution. Here is what Tun Dr Ismail said according to a book written by Ooi Kee Beng:

"I regard the special position of the Malays as a handicap given to the Malays with the consent of all the other races who have become citizens of this country so as to enable the Malays to compete on equal footing for equal opportunities in this country. That and that alone is the only aim of the Special Position of the Malays. But unfortunately the Malays themselves have tended to give the impression consciously or unconsciously that the Special Position of the Malays is a sign that the Malays are placed superior to the other races in the country. The biggest mistake that the Malays made of course was to coin the term "Bumiputra" because this term tended to convey an entirely different meaning to what was intended for the Special Position of the Malays. By coining "Bumiputra" the non-Malays suspected the Malays of wanting to classify themselves as first-class citizens while they were relegated to second-class (Letters 23 February 1970)".

"An UMNO man complained at a meeting that despite Malay rights, the Malaysian contingent preparing for the Munich Olympics was made up mainly of Chinese. "Where are Malay rights there?" he asked. No one knew what to say, and it fell on Ismail to answer: "Special rights are only in the field of economics, not in sports," he ventured. "Do you mean to say we should use strings to make Malays good at high jump?" At that he burst out laughing. That was one of the few times I saw him laugh so heartily (Interview with Tun Ghafar 16 Oct 2005)".

I argued that the dynamics of Malaysian politics have slightly shifted into a new direction since the last election. Race-based politics may or may not be relevant, if it's not relevant, it's a matter of time. Like-wise, if the other races want equality, all should compromise. If not, it is a big stale mate. I think we are seeing the start of the transition in the cities. It would be a long time until the rural folks would start thinking about it. Having said that, I still think that our country will remain a country with Islam as its official religion and the king is recognized as the Head of State. As long as that remains, the Malays will be in a slightly "privileged" position. That's just an opinion.

He also argued that we were never invaded by the Brits; we were merely consulted on administrative advice. The word he used was 'jajah' (conquer) and that the Brits never conquered us. I said, if you were right, somebody needs to change our history books and what we're teaching our kids.

For those who are second-guessing me, this is my stand: The Special Rights are there to allow the Malays to compete on a level-playing field. When that day happens, i.e. Malay has 55% of the economic pie (the term economic pie is also subject to discussion), the handicap should be removed, like the game of golf.

Saturday, July 12, 2008

Career Talk at Royal Military College

Had another career talk at RMC. It's been difficult to secure slots for OPs this year. It has been equally challenging to find volunteers. Despite all these issues, we finally had one session today. Took some photos of Sungai Besi town and RMC. These might turn out to be a classic collection in years to come because of the possible relocation of RMC. I got a bit emotional today hence all the snapping. Dad said RMC should be in a better shape with the new location; fully equipped with upgraded and more resilient infrastructure against typical budak boy vandalism and most importantly unlimited supply of water. I argued about the power lines and why NDU is claiming our spot. In the end, seniors normally win debates. Juniors get on the ground and take 20 push-ups.

The default hang out place for PPs and OPs alike has been standing at the same corner for years.

In the middle of Sungai besi town. Hasn't changed an inch since we left in 96.
As you approach the guard house, the sign "University Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia" stands out like a sore thumb. The sign "Maktab Tentera Diraja" is on the left side and is still there.
The fields on both side of the road are now properties of UPNM.

This is now the unofficial 'border' between UPNM and RMC.


Director of Studies Shahrudin, Commandant Kept Alias and Army Lawyer Chief Instructor Maj Feizol.
OP Habibur eloquently delivering his speech.




Commandants since Sir Gerald Templar, founder of the then Federation Military College.

Chicken chop at Sand Dune. Farouk's favorite.


Proud to be part of this tradition. I'm expecting my son to be the third generation.

Iranian O&G Development and Drilling in Alaska

Iran is set to drill another 160 wells by March 2009. That would translate into multi-billion dollar investments, heavy mobilization of equipment and man power and potential growth for the economy. Although Total has pulled out of that race, rest assured that many National Oil Cos will participate in this endeavor.

President of Iran has also proposed the use of a single currency to help combat the ailing US dollar affect on oil price. This is both political and economic. This was also echoed by our former Prime Minister on the use of Euro for the industry.

With Iran set to be the third biggest gas producer in the world by 2020 with an estimated production of 620 billion cubic yards, no wonder it is proposing another setup similar to OPEC but for gas producers. How will this impact the politics of gas? We have seen how former USSR countries were held hostage due to the dependence of Russian gas.

Meanwhile, the US is opening up Alaska and the Arctic National Wildlife Reserve to more development drilling activities. This is totally counter productive as the reserves will not satisfy the growing consumption of gas-guzzling SUVs and others. The US alone consumes 25 million barrels a day and produces only 1/3 of it. Senator Obama is ready to set the tone for a new energy policy if installed as the new POTUS such as the use of E85, lowering carbon emission by investing in R&D and manufacturing of fuel-efficient cars (therefore creating a sustainable competition against the Japanese auto onslaught).

A piece of advice from George Bush

George Bush telling incoming Senator Obama during their first official meet at the White House: "Come over here for a second,". "You know," he said quietly, "I hope you don't mind me giving you a piece of advice."

"Not at all, Mr. President".

He nodded. "You've got a bright future," he said. "Very bright. But I've been in this town awhile and, let me tell you, it can be tough. When you get a lot of attention like you've been getting, people start gunnin' for ya. And it won't necessarily just be coming from my side, you understand. From yours, too. Everybody'll be waiting for you to slip, know what I mean? So watch yourself".

Friday, July 11, 2008

The Futurist Forum 2008 with John Naisbitt & Guest Speaker Tun Dr Mahathir

Anyone who has RM1200 to blow would find this interesting.

Host:
SFR Consultants Sdn Bhd & Open Doors Business Consultant Sdn Bhd


Time and Place
Date:
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Time:
8:30am - 1:00pm
Location:
Mandarin Oriental Hotel
City/Town:
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Contact Info
Phone:
0126172011
Email:

Thursday, July 10, 2008

UMNO Presidency handover, Debate and of JPA scholarships

  • UMNO President has finally confirmed the date of the handover. However, does that mean no one will contest for the top 2 posts? If so, will they get the 30% nomination?
  • The handover will be roughly a year before the next UMNO election and the 13th GE. It will be a daunting task for the new chairman of BN to prep and regain lost ground.
  • For those who are crazy about being a Wakil Rakyat, this is not the year to shine. The next UMNO election will be the one.
  • On another note, although DSAI has not been charged with any crime, he has moved 3 steps ahead by going to the Syariah courts, knowing well enough that there is no way Saiful could present 4 witnesses to prove his allegation.
  • First term Minister of Information has declared potential resignation if he fails to perform in the debate with the former deputy minister and finance minister who had access to all levels of confidential info, economic data and secrets above top secrets. Who will win this debate?
  • With the handover a sealed deal, how does this affect the race for Ketua Pemuda? Will KJ rise to challenge DMM and KT?
  • UMNO leaders have requested JPA to relook at the allocation for scholarship and revise the quota for Bumis. We are talking about a mere 2,000 scholarships. The problem with JPA scholarships is that the contract is loose. Students who benefit from the JPA scholarships either stay in the country where they obtained their degrees or work in the private sector. A small percentage, normally among the Malays, fail in their courses and are asked to return. Scholars who use tax payers money for their education must have a sense of responsibility and return to Malaysia to serve the country. JPA must tighten up their contractual agreements and ensure these students are made accountable. Scholars are also EXPECTED to be the next batch of leaders in Malaysia, whether in the private sector or government. Half of the JPA scholars I know don't even bother and have little sense of obligation to king and country. Pitiful.
  • Meanwhile, while some of us are still in the UMNO election fever, the market dipped by a few ticks. The expected dip is to 1,000 points by year end. Right time to purchase stocks if there's holding power. What's cooking in Ministry of Finance to regain investors' confidence in our market?
  • Also, last but not least, happy belated birthday TDM!

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

Fuel Price Protest Rally, Mosque in Putrajaya, IPP & Subsidized Gas

I spoke earlier about the demonstration planned by Kubang Kerian MP to gather 1,000,000-strong supporters and rally for the reduction of fuel price. The rally turned out to be an ugly concert with one artist getting beaten up for showing his behind. Even the PAS Mursyidul Am was grossly disappointed. A friend of mine insisted that democracy is all about the expression of the people through demonstrations. So much for demonstrations.

I've also received information about fellow Malaysians and Muslims not happy about the construction of a second mosque in Putrajaya to cater the rising population of the administrative city. I could understand rejection for building a rocket launch pad or spending tax payers money to buy a space shuttle but there is nothing wrong with building a mosque to cater for growing population.

IPPs enjoy a fixed rate for gas based on agreed contracts. It appears that we are at their mercy. This is a similar problem with toll concessionaires. Perhaps the windfall tax suggested by the Minister in charge makes sense. Gas price has been fixed at RM14.31 per mmbtu; market price is at RM47.69mmbtu. The dilemma is that when IPPs pay full market price, they will be adamant to increase the price of electricity. Perhaps it is time to look at nuclear energy. Meanwhile, it is a tough juggling act to satisfy all.

The heat of campaigning is becoming more intense. Those who got out of the penalty box from money politics are back in the race. Sour grapes who did not get retained as candidates in the last election are trying to make come backs in the upcoming party election. The intensity is also felt at every Wing of the party. However, there is little talk about change and vision. Perhaps vying for position is more important than the question "What would I do if elected"?

The other question is, who knows how to counter F-35s?

For couples who ditch their babies and let them rot in rivers and dumpsters, I will personally see to it that you rot in a federal prison with cane scars and homos lurking in the corner (if I am in power).

Tuesday, July 8, 2008

Only UMNO has the weight to change

Heavy discussions are ongoing among my peers as to what the way forward would like. Some argued about the relevance of racial-based politics, some argued about fundamentals, some argued about broader pictures the likes of education and social obligations.

Where do we move and how do we move? "Where" is the toughest question to answer first. Do we intend to have a true racial integration or will we still play racial cards? If we are headed to a true racial integration, what is the relevance of UMNO, MIC, MCA, DAP, Gerakan, Malay College Kuala Kangsar, MRSM, UNITAR, Sekolah Jenis Kebangsaan, Utusan Melayu, Article 153? Or are we just heading to a place where everyone is a Malaysian, neither is a Malay, nor a Chinese nor an Indian, but yes we need to keep institutions such as the chinese chambers of commerce to protect certain interests and Dewan Melayu, for example. There has to be some level of compromise. In the end, democracy shall prevail and we will get the voice of the majority.

Let's assume now that we have the "Malaysian" agenda as our primary objective. What vehicle shall we use? BN is still regarded as racial-based even though it represents the different races. PR is similar. Youngsters in this era of facebook and youtube are rebellious and craving for a change in the political landscape, consistent with "darah muda" (young blood). Parliament is a joke judging from the level of intelligence among MPs (in general and in public's perception) and the intensity and quality of discussion (there are exceptional members of Parliament whom I still highly regard).

I reckon people will also flip flop their choice of political affiliation based on the choice of the candidates, the political struggle and the current "trend", with the exception of hard cores, i.e. don't think Johoreans will lean to the other side anytime soon, like wise people in Bukit Bintang or Batu Gajah for that matter.

Fundamental issues that we need to address:
1. Is raced based politics relevant? If it's not, how shall it be implemented? Will we get the backing of the majority? How do we streamline the school system? How do we integrate? I'm not interested with the obvious problems, I'm more keen to work out solutions. Perhaps our first goal, as my good friend suggested, is to frame this in a proper context and disseminate the information (will not get into details, this will be topic of offline discussions). Have to decide which platform to use. Can't just be idealists.

2. Should we move to a popular vote system? There are numerous inherent problems with the delegate system. It also creates opportunities for money politics. Perhaps we could coin something and present to the higher ups to consider (or wait for one of our direct contacts to become President and amend the party constitution). Having said that, I still think parties like UMNO have great influence. It's a matter of selling the point. We can't negate the fact that it's still an influential party.

3. Integrate all wings into one party. There should be no youth, wanita, puteri. All should be treated as equals, seniors and wise men should be respected, youth should be heard. In the end, it's back to our cardinal beliefs in "Kesopanan dan Kesusilaan".

4. Education: Need to streamline education into ONE system if everyone's hyped about racial integration. Segregation is almost unbelievable especially at local universities.

5. Economics: Where do we see ourselves beyond our thin oil reserves? What is our second engine of growth and is it strong enough to face global challenges?

............... there are more blanks to be filled. Let's move forward. We either hope our current leaders will implement or stay in the game long enough to implement it. No use sitting at the sidelines.

I am a PROUD member of UMNO and a product of the NDP. Unfortunately, this is what UMNO Youth in Putrajaya are talking about. You guys decide how we move forward (and please, no demonstrations recommended).

Putrajaya Kini

"Nampaknya modal si khairun berkempen semakin meningkat........kini pemuda-pemuda dibawa ke palm garden pulak.......makan jgn tak makan..........jgn tak habis makan sudah.....nanti Allah marah kalau membazir........Apa-apa pun syabas khairun kerana masih kekalkan momentum kempen di hotel-hotel.........Ye la kalau hotel lebih selesa dari kedai mamak atau kelab tasik atau tomyam dengkil, tomyam bangi..........Ada masalah?..........Tak ada..........Cuma seronok tengok cara kempen org2 yg nak bertanding......moga-moga murah rezeki sebab banyak bagi pemuda makan....tapi jgn la sampai jadi gemuk macam amri atau rozi.."

Anti Wayang Putrajaya

"ASSALAMUALAIKUM WARGA PEMUDA,
DUA ISTILAH IAITU MENGENANG BUDI ATAU MENGAMPU....KITA BERBAIK DGN BOS, ADAKAH KITA MENGENANG BUDI ATAU KITA SENGAJA NK BODEK?????? CONTOH DR PEMUDA KITA BOLEH LIHAT AMRI DIA NI TERGOLONG DR YG MANA SATU....MENGENANG BUDI ATAU MENGAMPU?????? AZIZ HALIM MENGENANG BUDI ATAU MENGAMPU...AMIR MENGENANG BUDI ATAU MENGAMPU YG TAHU HANYA DIA DAN ALLAH SAHAJA....JAWAB JGN X JAWAB..."

My Pemuda

"Salam hormat pemuda Putrajaya. Semoga semua sejahtera dalam keadaan poket tenat dek kenaikan harga barang... Tadi aku bersama 7 orang ahli pemuda cawangan dijemput bersua dengan Khairun calon Ketua Pemuda Putrajaya. Sahabat-sahabat yang lain tidak dapat turut serta. Sepatutnya dengan Zaki dulu iaitu pada 18 Jun 2008 yang lepas aku telah set dengan Amri, tapi sampai jam 2 petang hari tersebut tiada seorang kempen manager Zaki yang cal aku. So aku sms semula kepada semua pemuda cawangan bahawa perjumpaan yang dicadangkan dibatalkan."

Monday, July 7, 2008

No one cares that oil and food crises are world issues

Sat with our branch members yesterday, discussing among other things food and oil price. Many argued with our chief that the government should be doing more to subsidize petrol. Granted that many may not agree with how our chief operates and that he should step down (which is a separate discussion), let's put the facts on the table:
  • Oil price is highly driven by hedge funds and futures market. The rise has been almost 50% in the market since early this year versus a mere 10% oil stock gain.
  • Endowment funds from Harvard, Yale and Princeton are also the culprits. However US congress has passed bills to restrict hedge funds from manipulating the price of commodities.
  • Yes, we cannot compare ourselves with Singapore but we need to compare ourselves with other oil producing nations. Firstly, our production is a minute 600,000 barrels per day and consumption eats 75% of that. Although Indonesia produces more, close to 1.1M barrels per day, they sell the cheap shit at the pumps, RON90. Of course, income per capita needs to be compared too, and that's a separate issue. That's all about the well being of economics and the purchasing power of the Ringgit.
  • Yes, because of the higher oil price, Petronas makes more profit. Profit is reinvested into acreage outside the country. Should we negate growth for the sake of distribution? That's a classic socialist stand and we're not going there I hope. Why should every walk of life enjoy the subsidy at the pumps? Surely there are better ways for redistributing wealth. The impact or efficiency of the current distribution method is a topic of a separate issue.
  • Yes, because Petronas is an efficient money making machine, Government makes more year in year out. Petronas is in no position to decide how royalty and tax money is spent. That's up to the Minister of Finance. Even the former Finance Minister was against the former PM on subsidies and now he is promising another false hope that he would give back the subsidy if he is crowned PM. Any populist could do that.
  • Government subsidizes not just petrol, but education (which is close to RM7B a year and that's just up to secondary edu), scholarships, funds for universities, natural gas for power consumption and cooking, palm oil for cooking, LRT, feeder buses for LRT. Funny how the people who benefit from scholarships and tertiary education are the same people criticizing the Government (let's generalize the term Government, we may argue about the difference in leadership present and past, etc). They should join the struggle and not just become arm chair critics.
  • Suddenly everyone is interested about how the Government spends our money. Has anyone checked the Budget every year? Has anyone read the 9th Malaysian Plan? Has anyone researched the mid term report by Finance Minister at Parliament? How much do you think we need to pay the salary and pension for more than 1 million civil servants? What's the cost of purchasing equipment and gear for our cops and soldiers to protect and serve? Without subsidies, how much do you think a medical checkup for flu would cost? I reckon no one cares.
  • We also talked about government efficiency. My take: we can't just blame the civil servants. We should stream line operations and make it efficient; need to discard irrelevant ministries and merge overlapping authorities. The US has 15 cabinet secretaries managing 250 million people, surely we don't need 31 to manage 26M. This requires balls made of steel and strong political will. Obviously it would not happen in a fortnight especially with the fact that although UMNO is the backbone of BN, they are not a big majority and still requires co-operation from component parties. That is the dilemma.
  • On NEP: if people are against the NEP, what is a better economic solution to stimulate growth? Should we invite capitalism to dinner? Should we let the strongest and fittest run over the mom and pop shops? It's the same argument with globalization.
Leaders need to decide how to balance between satisfying party members and coalition members, serving the Rakyat and making the right not popular decisions. These are monumental tasks and for people who are afraid of losing power, it will be near impossible. Many leaders wanting to make the right decisions may not get the right kind of support from within the party, therefore reluctant to. People outside the party refuse to dirt themselves by affiliating themselves to a party.

Branch level will commence their meetings on 19th July. Remember that who you choose at Branch level will impact those at division level, consequently national level. Make the right choice. I have yet to decide on my choice; it's all about the lesser of two evils.

Sunday, July 6, 2008

Let's look into solar power

With Malaysia's natural source of solar all year long, it's logical that we should look into this further. US venture capitalists have poured more than USD3.2B in 2007 to look at the viability of the power source. Of course detractors will admit that petroleum will reign supreme for the next 30-50 years, however, it doesn't mean that we should wait for that day when reserves have depleted and then develop other fuel source. The Japanese have begun the race for hydrogen cell. Should we just stand still and politicize petty issues? Obviously everyone would not ride their bicycles to Parliament or to work as a solution.

The creation of this sector will induce a much needed stimulus into the economy. Jobs can be created and manufacturers will be busy providing elements of the supply chain such as wafers, panels and other components. We can turn part-time Astro installers into roof top installers. Although this form of power generation is still heavily subsidized, (in the region of 9 cents per kilowatt-hour in California for example), nevertheless it might provide some relief off the pressure on natural gas usage for power generation, therefore reducing the price of natural gas. That is the theory. This also reduces green house emission to favorable rates.

By 2020, it is expected that the top 10 nations with the highest solar exposure will expect cost reduction of solar energy down to 12 cents per kilowatt-hour and reach grid parity, even though this will only represent a mere 3% of the total power generation in those countries. As much as USD500B will be poured from now till 2020 with the intention of intensifying R&D to increase the current efficiency of roughly 30% and to reduce the cost of manufacturing components.

The shift of manufacturing components will be to low-cost countries and Malaysia should not miss the boat. The coming era is the energy race. Government will have to decide whether it is worth the while to attract investors into this country for R&D, setup manufacturing capabilities and establish policies that will ensure that Malaysians will benefit from the reduction of carbon emission, job creation, technology enhancement and above all, power generation.

DS Khaled Nordin is now live

Please welcome DS Khaled Nordin to the world of blogging!

Interesting Poll from www.drkhir.com