Showing posts with label parliament. Show all posts
Showing posts with label parliament. Show all posts

Friday, July 18, 2008

Efficiency in Allocating Resources (of scholarships and NEP provisions)

Parliament is actively debating the allocation of scholarships with respect to racial composition in the country. The scholarships would allow students to further their studies to possibly the university of their choice or with similar credentials. The current allocation is 55% for Bumiputra and 45% for nons. According to YB Ahmad Maslan (BN-Pontian), the latest statistical data indicates the population of Bumiputra at 66%, therefore the allocation of scholarship should reflect the racial composition.

This is a highly sensitive subject, therefore requires much discussion and debate (contrary to what people in general think that the more sensitive it is, the less we should talk about it). Having said that, I'm walking on thin ice and trying to use the best of terms and words to describe and relay my opinion on this subject matter. The NEP/NDP has always been well-intended (to eliminate identification of race by economic function). It is also a well-thought plan to elevate the Malays to high economic stature. However, the by-product of NED/NDP could be the further polarization in this country because of the poor implementation and leakages.
  • The common argument is that the Malays in the rural area are not ready to compete, therefore require aid to compete in the 'open' market context. I totally agree with this (but it shouldn't sacrifice the need to attract the brightest and smartest).
  • UMNO leaders will continue to fight for the allocation for the Malays as they are their power base, likewise the other parties.
  • As long as we have fragmented education system starting from primary level, the segregation and polarization would continue to get worse and it would be more apparent at tertiary level.
  • Universities need to be ran by professionals without 'political obligations'. Universities should also be ran like a business. Harvard attracts an endowment fund of close to US27B because it's being run like a business. I'm not saying we can be like Harvard in 5 years, I'm just saying we have to head in that direction. Down South has a better rated university than us because it's ran like a business. It is a business. It's one of the biggest revenue for the US after arms, entertainment and technology.
  • On scholarships: Contractual agreements must be reviewed to ensure that our students return home and serve the country, be it private or public sector. A small percentage of scholars (including non-Bumi) must be groomed to enter the public sector, be it GLC or into the government as PTD officers. Have them sign a contract for at least 7 years.
  • Students who fail to maintain scholastic achievements must repay the full amount of the scholarship and sent back home. The effort in collecting debt from unpaid student loans must be doubled. Those who violate this must be sued and be made example.
  • A small percentage must be allocated for the 'elite' students, those who have a high chance of gaining entry into Ivy League or Ivy-League equivalent schools, the Oxfords of the world, Imperial etc. THESE are the ones we need to take care of. This should be merit-based regardless of family background. These students should be lined up for the next CEOs and senior managements of GLC, govt, banking institutions, multinationals, universities (need to encourage the teaching profession by increasing pay grade for those who deserve), etc.
  • What I'm interested to know is how much the scholarship covers and what is the actual budget. I don't think everyone needs to get really excited about this since other corporate entities offer scholarships as well. If the other non-Malays think Petronas and such are too biased and award scholarships to only Malays, let's get the big Chinese conglomerates to fly Malay students to MIT, then we'll talk.
  • Judging from my personal recruitment experience of local graduates, our local products are still mediocre. Little confidence level, poor command of English. It is consistent with feedback from other oil companies. There needs to be a balance between adhering to the quota and getting the best and brightest.

Thursday, July 17, 2008

On Debates and Parliamentary 'Acts'

Debates are expected to be the next in-thing. Healthy debates are good to thrash out ideas and point of view. Debates also show character and how people would react to pressure. The candidates for UMNO presidency, deputy presidency and vice presidency should be invited to debate on topics related to the relevance of the party's struggle (but if the post of president and deputy were recommended to be closed for contest, who are they going to debate against?).

The only recommendation I could think of for future debates is to have a stern moderator who controls the topic of discussion. Debaters MUST answer the questions given by the panel appointed. Of course, veteran politicians tend to beat around the bush when it comes to answering questions. However, we're more interested to discuss numbers and facts. Save the political talk during party programs. So far, it's a good start for Malaysian political landscape. It also boosts tv ratings and advertising potentials.

On MPs and their parliamentary class act (giving the speaker a big headache) and other stunts:
  • MP cycling to Parliament. Have they been cycling to work lately?
  • MPs from Perak including MB took the bus to Parliament.
  • MP proposed to build rocket launch pad in Sabah
  • The use of the word "Bocor" (9th May 2007, 2 MPs used the word "bocor" against Batu Gajah MP and forced to apologize by DS Sharizat)
  • Raising the right hand during swearing-in ceremony (8th May 2008, when one MP did not raise his right hand during swearing-in ceremony, another MP claimed that his right hand is injured and did not want to raise his)
  • 1oth July 08: MPs got riled about goats and how one Australian stud could mate with 80 females goats.
  • MPs talking about "pokok tidak akan bergoyang kalau tiada angin bertiup (the tree would not sway if there is no wind blowing)" followed by "mungkin ada monyet yang menggoyangkan pokok (maybe there's a monkey shaking it)".
  • Close-one-eye MP (last session)